Mortgage Burden Exceeds Historic Levels in 10 of the Largest U.S. Markets, Zillow Finds

The combination of rising home prices and interest rates creates a doubly challenging environment for would-be home buyers, making monthly mortgage payments on even modestly priced homes more of a financial burden.

A monthly mortgage payment for the typical U.S. home requires 17.5 percent of the median income, up from 15.4 percent a year earlier, according to online real estate company Zillow’s second quarter affordability report.

Between 2012 and 2016, mortgage rates hovered near historic lows, extending what buyers could afford even as home values recovered from the Great Recession and reached new heights.

But interest rates have shown a marked increase in 2017 and 2018, eating into that affordability. The monthly mortgage burden is greater than the historic average in 10 of the 50 biggest U.S. housing markets.

Seven of these 10 markets are along the West Coast, which has seen particularly strong home value appreciation since the recession.

The typical rent now requires 28.4 percent of the median income, slightly lower than it did a year ago as rent growth has slowed below the pace of income growth.

Although rent affordability remains worse today than it was in the 1980s and 1990s, it has gradually improved after peaking in late 2010.

Housing Costs are a Heavier Financial Burden for the Lowest-Income Earners

The diminished housing affordability is especially notable for lower-income renters. Nationwide, the typical rent in the most affordable third of the market requires 62.7 percent of the median income in the lowest third of incomes.

In all of the 35 largest housing markets, the typical rent for a more affordable rental requires at least 40 percent of the median bottom-third income.

Similarly, mortgage payments for the lowest-income earners are also significantly more burdensome than for those earning the most, even if they buy a home in the most affordable third of the market.

Mortgage payments require nearly twice as much of the median income for lower-earning buyers (23.9 percent) than they do for the highest-income buyers (12.9 percent).

The difference in the financial burden between higher-income and lower-income renters and buyers is greatest in Los Angeles. The median rent in the least expensive third of the market required more than 100 percent of the typical income for the lowest-earning people living there.

That leaves few options to realistically afford rent and other expenses on a typical income, outside of a housing subsidy, doubling up with roommates or taking on a second or even a third job to help make ends meet.

Copyright Today’s Credit Unions